This was one of the photos I took in London of a War Memorial. I think the ideas of past, present, and future are very well represented here. I took this picture in the present, in London. Quite obviously, the war memorial is built in honor of a past war, and is built in an architectural style of the past. The cranes in the background suggest a future, the future of buildings and growth within London.
This is a present picture, I only took it a few days ago. However as time passes this picture becomes more and more a piece of the past, as pictures are not current, they are snapshots that stay still while the modern day rushes forward. In a year will those cranes still be there? Even now, the cars in the foreground will have moved and the people will be different. You would not be able to exactly replicate this picture or this moment today.
That is partly why I try so hard to take pictures when I am traveling; I try to capture a moment, a feeling and surrounding so that I may share it with family. I almost always fail. I end up with pictures and pictures of walls and architecture that in no way reflect the emotions I felt at the time. Pictures have a way of being distant, up to interpretation. Certainly, photos you have taken can evoke memories, and certain configurations can evoke universal emotions, but this is more difficult to capture in travel photos. I cannot take a picture of a wall and show it to someone and have them see the wall, and feel the wonder of the old the way I did. My dad has criticized my photography skills before, saying that I take too many scenery shots with nothing significant in them. I realize this, but I still try to document moments, even if later I forget them I have the hope that in the future my pictures will evoke the same emotions I felt at the moment I was capturing.
Traveling through London, I almost get the shivers. I got them at the Tower of London, when I realized that the White Tower is from the 11th Century, and here I am inside it, touching it. It made me wonder who else walked through that building, what it looked like in the past and if the people from the past ever thought about if their buildings would last the test of time. I certainly wonder if my generation, or even our time period, will leave a mark the way the White Tower or countless other ancient buildings in London do. The other day we sat down to eat in a pub and realized the building we were eating casually in was older than our country of the United States of America. It is quite odd to think about when you are in a newer country and don't have the chance to be surrounded by such ancient, alive history.
As our society goes, our skyscrapers might last somewhat, but not perfectly. They may stand in the sky like steel skeletons, not what they are today. As far as documentation goes, you need a computer with internet access that operates to find any of our records. If a solar flare came at the Earth stright on (which by sheer chance this hasn't happened already), then our magnetic field would be wiped, all of our electronics fried, and the entire history and records from our generation and future generatiosn would be completely gone. There are no paper backups. It's odd to think that a natural disaster such as that (and if a solar flare such as that happened, that would be the only consequence. We would not burn up, our magnetic field would just get wiped and our technology would no longer operate) that our entire history would be gone since we do not keep anything on paper or in physical backed up form. People in this day and age are obsessed with documentation, with putting their entire lives on the internet, and by random chance it might completely get erased. Our generation's own Great Fire.